Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524142›Full record

Trial reportAnatomical sciences education2025

The effectiveness of immersive virtual reality as a student-centered tool for learning neuroanatomy: A single-blind randomized controlled trial with physiotherapy students.

Paloma García-Robles, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Irene Cortés-Pérez, María Del Rocío Ibancos-Losada, Ángeles Díaz-Fernández, María Catalina Osuna-Pérez

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paloma García-RoblesFRATERNIDAD Muprespa, Linares, Spain.
Esteban Obrero-GaitánDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8430-5500
Irene Cortés-PérezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
María Del Rocío Ibancos-LosadaFISIDEC University Center, University of Córdoba, Cabra, Spain.
Ángeles Díaz-FernándezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5938-8976
María Catalina Osuna-PérezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroanatomy is a crucial component of the physiotherapy curriculum, but its complexity can lead to "neurophobia" among students. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) offers an innovative alternative to traditional methods by providing interactive and realistic three-dimensional images of neurological structures. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of IVR for learning neuroanatomy and to assess student satisfaction and motivation. We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial with 67 second-year physiotherapy students. Besides didactic lectures, students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first was an IVR group (n = 34), in which students studied autonomously using the MetaQuest 2 IVR device with the SharecareYOU VR application (60 min), after having received instructions on how to use it (30 min). The second group (n = 33) followed a traditional learning approach using anatomical atlases and textbooks (90 min). Knowledge retention was assessed through an 18-item questionnaire, while satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and usability of the IVR headset were evaluated using other questionnaires. Evaluations were carried out immediately after the intervention, and four weeks later. The IVR group demonstrated significantly higher knowledge retention overall (p < 0.001) as well as in specific areas, such as theoretical understanding, spatial location, and labeling of brain areas (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were maintained 4 weeks after the intervention (p = 0.37). Additionally, IVR students reported greater satisfaction (p < 0.001) and found it useful for learning (p < 0.001) without adverse events. Our findings show that IVR is a safe supplementary tool that is more effective for enhancing neuroanatomical education in physiotherapy than textbooks and atlases.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionNeuroanatomyPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPhysical Therapy SpecialtyStudents, Health OccupationsVirtual RealityAdultCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLearningMaleMotivationSingle-Blind Methodanatomy educationlearning technologyneuroanatomyphysiotherapy studentsstudent‐centered learningvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40524142
PMCPMC12511658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.