Trial reportAnatomical sciences education2025
The effectiveness of immersive virtual reality as a student-centered tool for learning neuroanatomy: A single-blind randomized controlled trial with physiotherapy students.
Trial report in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immersive virtual reality vs. traditional instruction for short-term learning and follow-up outcomes in the Bobath concept: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Effects of metaverse-based education on motivation and academic achievement in undergraduate physiotherapy students: a randomized three-arm study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- The effectiveness of immersive virtual reality as a student-centered tool for learning neuroanatomy: A single-blind randomized controlled trial with physiotherapy students.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Trial
- Curriculum Innovation: Virtual Reality for Neuroanatomy Education Among Neurology Residents.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
- Extended reality and web-based imaging in case-based anatomy education: a two-year study of knowledge retention on anomalies and variations.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Cadaver Dissections in Medical School Based on Functional Neuroanatomy Improve Results: A Double Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroanatomy is a crucial component of the physiotherapy curriculum, but its complexity can lead to "neurophobia" among students. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) offers an innovative alternative to traditional methods by providing interactive and realistic three-dimensional images of neurological structures. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of IVR for learning neuroanatomy and to assess student satisfaction and motivation. We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial with 67 second-year physiotherapy students. Besides didactic lectures, students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first was an IVR group (n = 34), in which students studied autonomously using the MetaQuest 2 IVR device with the SharecareYOU VR application (60 min), after having received instructions on how to use it (30 min). The second group (n = 33) followed a traditional learning approach using anatomical atlases and textbooks (90 min). Knowledge retention was assessed through an 18-item questionnaire, while satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and usability of the IVR headset were evaluated using other questionnaires. Evaluations were carried out immediately after the intervention, and four weeks later. The IVR group demonstrated significantly higher knowledge retention overall (p < 0.001) as well as in specific areas, such as theoretical understanding, spatial location, and labeling of brain areas (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were maintained 4 weeks after the intervention (p = 0.37). Additionally, IVR students reported greater satisfaction (p < 0.001) and found it useful for learning (p < 0.001) without adverse events. Our findings show that IVR is a safe supplementary tool that is more effective for enhancing neuroanatomical education in physiotherapy than textbooks and atlases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.