Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524122›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2025

Cerebellar control over inter-regional excitatory/inhibitory dynamics discriminates execution from observation of an action.

Roberta Maria Lorenzi, Gökçe Korkmaz, Adnan A S Alahmadi, Anita Monteverdi, Letizia Casiraghi, Egidio D'Angelo, Fulvia Palesi, Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Cerebellar Connectome.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberta Maria Lorenzi *Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Gökçe Korkmaz *Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Adnan A S AlahmadiDepartment of Radiologic Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Anita MonteverdiDigital Neuroscience Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Letizia CasiraghiDepartment of Mental Health and Dependence, ASST of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Egidio D'AngeloDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Fulvia PalesiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-KingshottDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. c.wheeler-kingshott@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Ataxia UK DRPLABiomedical Research Council, UK BRC704/CAP/CGWEuropean Commission 650003Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 945539 (EBRAINS, HBP SGA3)Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 956414HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme 101137289 (VBT)Medical Research Council MR/S026088/1Multiple Sclerosis Society 77National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) IR00011-EBRAINS-ItalyNextGenerationEU MNESYS (PE0000006)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The motor learning theory anticipates that cerebro-cerebellar loops perform sensorimotor prediction, thereby regulating motor control during action execution (AE) and observation (AO), but the causal interaction between the cerebellum and cerebral cortex remains unclear. Therefore, our aim was to understand what triggers neuronal activity between brain areas engaged in a visuo-motor task that involves cortico-cerebellar interactions, organised in loops. We used Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) to study functional MRI (fMRI) data obtained in healthy participants during a squeeze-ball task in either execution or observation conditions. In both cases, active regions included bilateral primary visual cortex (V1), left primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor and premotor cortex (SMAPMC), cingulate cortex (CC), superior parietal lobule (SPL), and right cerebellum (CRBL). Networks supporting executing or observing an action showed the same effective connectivity, with pathways between regions wired in closed loops. However, the cerebellar communication towards the cerebral cortex switched from excitatory in execution to inhibitory in observation. Moreover, when executing the action signal modulation was non-linear from SMAPMC to CRBL and within the CRBL self-connection, supporting that the CRBL elaborates motor plans received from SMAPMC. Thus, the need for motor planning and the presence of a sensorimotor feedback in action execution discriminate the modality of forward control operated by the CRBL. Interestingly, this study also showed that the CRBL differentially controls the excitatory/inhibitory dynamics of inter-regional effective connectivity, depending on its functional engagement. These findings are fundamental for understanding brain dynamics in health and disease and for designing artificial sensorimotor controllers.

Indexed as

CerebellumPsychomotor PerformanceAdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysYoung AdultCerebellumDynamic causal modelsError detectionMotor controlMotor learningSensorimotor feedback

Identifiers

PMID40524122
PMCPMC12170755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.