Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524117›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2025

The applications of ChatGPT and other large language models in anesthesiology and critical care: a systematic review.

Nicolas Daccache, Joe Zako, Louis Morisson, Pascal Laferrière-Langlois

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolas DaccacheMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Centre, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-2025-802X
Joe ZakoMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Centre, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Louis MorissonMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Centre, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Pascal Laferrière-LangloisMaisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Centre, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. pascal.laferriere-langlois@umontreal.ca.

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 322164Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 324061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) have gained immense popularity since their commercial release in 2022, with applications in various sectors including health care. We sought to evaluate their deployment in anesthesiology and critical care in a systematic review. Our aim was to describe the integration of LLMs in the field by showcasing and categorizing their current applications, assessing their performance in patient care, and reviewing application-specific ethical and practical challenges in deployment.

methodsRespecting Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched through PubMed®, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science®, from inception until 1 August 2024. We extracted all papers investigating LLMs in anesthesiology or critical care and reporting results. We segmented the literature into major themes and highlighted key findings and limitations.

resultsFrom 480 retrieved articles, we included 45 papers. The evaluated models (GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Google Bard [now Gemini], LLaMA, and others) showed diverse applications in four segments: intensive care unit, patient education, medical education, and perioperative care. Large language models, especially newer models, are promising in predicting clinical scores, navigating simple clinical scenarios, and managing preoperative anxiety. Their performance remains below the clinician level in predicting outcomes, solving complex clinical scenarios (i.e., airway management), board examinations, and generating patient-directed documents, although newer models performed better than older ones.

conclusionWhile LLMs are not yet equipped to fully assist physicians in anesthesiology and critical care, they have significant potential, and their capabilities are rapidly improving. Supervised use for select tasks can streamline patient care. Further trials are warranted as new versions of models become available. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ( CRD42024567380 ); first submitted 22 July 2024.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyCritical CareLanguageGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language Modelsanesthesiologyartificial intelligenceChatGPTlarge language models

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.