ArticleAIDS and behavior2025
Opinions and Concerns Surrounding Long-Acting Injectable (LAI) and Oral HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Current and Former LAI and Oral PrEP Users.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-acting injectable (LAI) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has potential to increase PrEP uptake and adherence. However, most studies investigating opinions about LAI PrEP were done prior to its approval. We administered a cross-sectional electronic survey to clients at an urban PrEP clinic in the U.S. South. Eligible participants were 18 + and had previously taken or been prescribed oral or LAI PrEP. They were asked their opinions on PrEP, barriers to access, perceived HIV risk, and PrEP stigma. Between January and April 2024, 123 people participated. Twenty-two (17.9%) used LAI PrEP, 80 (65.0%) oral PrEP, and 21 (17.1%) were not currently using PrEP. Most participants identified as men (87.8%), and mean age was 38.6 (range 19-78). Participants were 52.8% White, 27.6% Black, and 14.6% Latinx. 56.1% preferred injection versus daily oral pill. Common concerns about PrEP included side effects (n = 48), cost of medication (n = 21), and cost of clinic visits/tests (n = 21). Of those taking oral PrEP, 56.3% reported remaining on oral because LAI was not offered to them and/or they were not aware of it. Perceived HIV risk scores were on average higher for those not currently taking PrEP (not on = 26.8, SD = 6.54; LAI = 22.3, SD = 6.45; oral = 24.2, SD = 6.13). Overall, participants had low to moderate PrEP stigma scores. Despite majority preference for LAI PrEP, patients are frequently unaware of or not offered LAI. Common concerns about PrEP include side effects and costs. These data demonstrate the importance of improving LAI PrEP awareness and accessibility of choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.