ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Development of artificial intelligence and multi-sensor-based dexterity assessment system: performance evaluation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Manual dexterity tests are essential for diagnosing diseases and evaluating professional skills that require fine motor control. Traditional assessments often depend on expert supervision, leading to delays, subjectivity, and inaccuracies. This study introduces an automated dexterity assessment system that integrates multiple sensors and artificial intelligence algorithms for high-precision evaluation. The system classifies hand movements, analyzes muscle contraction levels, and determines hold-release durations using electromyography (EMG), inertial measurement units (IMU), and image processing techniques. An expert system interprets the multimodal sensor data and presents the results to clinicians. A performance evaluation with 20 participants demonstrated the system's capability to assess hand dexterity automatically and accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.