ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Clinical and therapeutic clues from a long-term follow-up: a single center experience on a large LOPD population.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pompe disease is an inherited metabolic disorder, caused by acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA) enzyme deficiency. Late-onset form (LOPD) usually presents with proximal and axial myopathy, followed by progressive respiratory involvement. Since 2006, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has been the gold standard treatment. Recently, two ERTs of second generation have been approved. Several studies have demonstrated the benefits of the first generation ERT (FG-ERT), although outcomes are quite variable, and very long-term data are limited. In fact, functional long-term studies are still needed to clearly point out the prolonged efficacy of FG-ERT. We describe a cohort of 49 LOPD patients, providing a very long-term follow-up of motor and pulmonary function of 30 of them treated by FG-ERT (from 2 to 20 years), using 6MWT, FVC, and GSGC score to evaluate patients' responses. 6MWT remained quite stable in the first 4 years of therapy, followed by a slow decline of its value of about 21%. FVC showed an improving trend in the first 4 years, followed by a decline of about 12%. Along the follow-up, GSGC score worsened with an increasing of about 30% of the total score values. Although long-term results evidenced variable therapeutic responses, the general trend is an improvement in motor and respiratory functions during the first 2-4 years of treatment, followed by a variable degree of decline. According to these results, and in line with recent EPOC recommendations, it is strongly suggested to start therapy in symptomatic patients, but also to carefully manage presymptomatic patients to timely supply ERT treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40524065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.