Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524063›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Salient distractors influence information accrual rather than quitting threshold in visual search.

Mark W Becker, Jeff Moher, Derrek T Montalvo, Andrew Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark W BeckerDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. Becker54@msu.edu.
Jeff MoherDepartment of Psychology, Connecticut College, New London, CT, 06320, USA.
Derrek T MontalvoDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Andrew RodriguezDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moher (Psychological Science, 31[1], 31-42, 2020) recently reported that adding a salient distractor (SD) to a visual search display results in more misses and faster target-absent reaction times, a pattern interpreted as a reduction in the quitting threshold; participants searched less of the display before responding target absent. This finding could have implications for real-world searches with distraction. However, in those experiments, the salient distractor shared critical features with the frequent distractors. In two experiments, we expand on this finding by showing that the pattern of results maintains when a salient distractor does not share critical features with the frequent distractors but reverses when it shares features with the target. The pattern of results is consistent with the salient distractor providing a rapid accumulation of evidence towards its associated boundary in a drift diffusion framework-when it shares features with the target there is a burst of evidence accumulation toward the "present" boundary; when it is a distractor there is a burst of evidence toward the "absent" boundary. We believe this account of the SD's impact provides a more parsimonious account than a quitting threshold account and can better explain when a salient distractor will harm or help target detection.

Indexed as

AttentionPattern Recognition, VisualAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultDrift diffusion modelsQuitting threshold effectVisual search

Identifiers

PMID40524063
PMCPMC12204935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.