Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524056›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2025

The dawn of a new era: can machine learning and large language models reshape QSP modeling?

Ioannis P Androulakis, Lourdes Cucurull-Sanchez, Anna Kondic, Krina Mehta, Cesar Pichardo, Meghan Pryor, Marissa Renardy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Structured Schemas for Provenance-Rich, LLM-Assisted QSP Model Calibration.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Modeling Amid the Rise of Agentic AI.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ioannis P AndroulakisBiomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA. yannis@soe.rutgers.edu.
Lourdes Cucurull-SanchezPharmetheus, AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna KondicBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Krina MehtaKyowa Kirin, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Cesar PichardoAstraZeneca R&D, Systems Medicine, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK.
Meghan PryorJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Spring House, PA, USA.
Marissa RenardyGSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Funding

Mechanistic Pharmacokinetics and PharmacodynamicsR35GM131800 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI JUSKO, WILLIAM J. · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) has emerged as a cornerstone of modern drug development, providing a robust framework to integrate data from preclinical and clinical studies, enhance decision-making, and optimize therapeutic strategies. By modeling biological systems and drug interactions, QSP enables predictions of outcomes, optimization of dosing regimens, and personalized medicine applications. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) hold the potential to significantly transform QSP by enabling enhanced data extraction, fostering the development of hybrid mechanistic ML models, and supporting the introduction of surrogate models and digital twins. This manuscript explores the transformative role of AI and ML in reshaping QSP modeling workflows. AI/ML tools now enable automated literature mining, the generation of dynamic models from data, and the creation of hybrid frameworks that blend mechanistic insights with data-driven approaches. Large Language Models (LLMs) further revolutionize the field by transitioning AI/ML from merely a tool to becoming an active partner in QSP modeling. By facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration, lowering barriers to entry, and democratizing QSP workflows, LLMs empower researchers without deep coding expertise to engage in complex modeling tasks. Additionally, the integration of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) holds the potential to autonomously propose, refine, and validate models, further accelerating innovation across multiscale biological processes. Key challenges remain in integrating AI/ML into QSP workflows, particularly in ensuring rigorous validation pipelines, addressing ethical considerations, and establishing robust regulatory frameworks to address the reliability and reproducibility of AI-assisted models. Moreover, the complexity of multiscale biological integration, effective data management, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration present ongoing hurdles. Despite these challenges, the potential of AI/ML to enhance hybrid model development, improve model interpretability, and democratize QSP modeling offers an exciting opportunity to revolutionize drug development and therapeutic innovation. This work highlights a pathway toward a transformative era for QSP, leveraging advancements in AI and ML to address these challenges and drive innovation in the field.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentMachine LearningModels, BiologicalArtificial IntelligenceData MiningLarge Language ModelsSystems BiologyArtificial Intelligence (AI)Drug DevelopmentHybrid ModelingLarge Language Models (LLMs)Machine Learning (ML)Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD)Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP)

Identifiers

PMID40524056
PMCPMC12170689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.