ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Clinical and analytical validation of a combined RNA and DNA exome assay across a large tumor cohort.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of the WD40-repeat protein family in cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Advances in Precision Oncology: From Molecular Profiling to Regulatory-Approved Targeted Therapies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Clinical and analytical validation of a combined RNA and DNA exome assay across a large tumor cohort.Communications medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombining RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) with whole exome sequencing (WES) from a single tumor sample can substantially improve the detection of clinically relevant alterations in cancer. However, routine clinical adoption of this integrated approach remains limited, especially for RNA-seq, due to the absence of standardized validation frameworks.
methodsWe developed and validated an assay that integrates RNA-seq and WES for evaluating gene expression, gene fusions, tumor microenvironment signatures, somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions/deletions (INDELs), and copy number variations (CNVs). Exome-wide somatic reference standards were generated to support analytical validation using multiple sequencing runs of cell lines at varying purities.
resultsAssay validation involves 3 steps: (1) analytical validation using custom reference samples containing 3042 SNVs and 47,466 CNVs; (2) orthogonal testing in patient samples; and (3) assessment of clinical utility in real-world cases. Applied to 2230 clinical tumor samples, the integrated assay enables direct correlation of somatic alterations with gene expression, recovery of variants missed by DNA-only testing, and improves detection of gene fusions. In addition to uncovering clinically actionable alterations in 98% of cases, the assay also reveals complex genomic rearrangements that would likely have remained undetected without RNA data.
conclusionsThis study provides practical validation guidelines for integrated RNA and DNA sequencing in clinical oncology. The combined assay enhances the detection of actionable alterations, thereby facilitating personalized treatment strategies for cancer patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.