Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40523895›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Relationship between grammar and schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dalia Elleuch, Yinhan Chen, Qiang Luo, Lena Palaniyappan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Increasing participation of people with thought disorder in clinical research.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dalia ElleuchHigher School of Health Sciences and Techniques of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5405-5803
Yinhan ChenInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Research Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qiang LuoInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Research Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0426-6039
Lena PalaniyappanDouglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. lena.palaniyappan@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1640-7182

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada) PJK192157Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada) PJT195903Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 226168/Z/22/ZWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 314138/Z/24/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchizophrenia significantly impairs everyday communication, affecting education and employment. Such communication difficulties may arise from deficits in syntax-understanding and generating grammatical structures. Research on syntactic impairments in schizophrenia is underpowered, with inconsistent findings, and it is unclear if deficits are specific to certain patient subgroups, regardless of symptom profiles, age, sex, or illness severity.

methodsA pre-registered (Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7FZUC ) search using PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases up to May 1, 2024, for all studies investigating syntax comprehension and production in schizophrenia vs. healthy controls. Excluding studies on those <18 years of age and qualitative research, we extracted Cohen's d and log coefficient of variation ratio and used Bayesian meta-analysis across 6 domains: 2 in comprehension and 4 in production in patient-control comparisons. Study quality was evaluated using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, with moderators (age, sex, study quality, language) tested via meta-regression.

resultsWe identify 86 relevant articles, of which 45 have sufficient data for meta-analysis (n = 2960 participants, 64.4% English, weighted mean age(sd) = 32.3(5.6)). Bayesian meta-analysis shows strong evidence of syntactic deficits in schizophrenia across all domains (d = 0.65-1.01, overall random-effects d = 0.86, 95% CrI [0.67-1.03]), with syntax comprehension being most affected, with weak publication bias. People with schizophrenia show increased variability in comprehension and production of long and complex utterances (lnCVR = 0.21, 95% CrI [0.07-0.36]), hinting at subgroups with differing performance.

conclusionsRobust impairments in grammatical comprehension and production in schizophrenia suggest opportunities for targeted interventions focusing on syntax, a rule-based feature amenable to cognitive, educational, and linguistic interventions.

Identifiers

PMID40523895
PMCPMC12170843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.