Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40523868›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026

Regular Medications Administered to Older Adults in Aged Care Facilities: A Retrospective Descriptive Study.

Stephanie M Garratt, Maneesh Prasad, Kelly Ottosen, Elizabeth Manias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie M GarrattSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5884-858X
Maneesh PrasadSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-6301-5496
Kelly OttosenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5600-456X
Elizabeth ManiasSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Monash University School of Nursing and Midwifery, Future Research Leader Grant 2023-2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIM(S): To explore which regularly prescribed medications are most commonly administered to older adults in aged care facilities in Australia, by whom and when, and to identify the prevalence of polypharmacy in this population group.

designRetrospective descriptive study.

methodsThis study involved exploratory analysis of de-identified medication administration records from March 17, 2023-March 18, 2024. Older adults' demographic and medication administration data were requested from two electronic medication chart providers in Australia. For inclusion, older adults must have been living in an aged care facility for the entire timeframe. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, activity pattern analysis, Welch two sample t-tests, ANOVA and independent sample t-tests. The STROBE checklist was used to report this study.

resultsIn all, 12,438 older adults were included, with a median age of 87, spanning 287 aged care facilities across Australia. Nervous system medications (over 16 million doses) and alimentary tract/metabolism medications (over 12 million doses) were the most administered. Within these, paracetamol 500 mg tablets and docusate sodium 50 mg + sennoside B 8 mg tablets were the most common. Quetiapine, a strong anticholinergic medication, was also present in the top 30 most administered medications. Certified nursing staff were the primary administrators of medication (66% of actions), followed by non-nursing staff (27%). Medications were predominantly administered before 10 am and after 10 pm. With a median of 8 regular medications administered per older adult per day, 78% experienced polypharmacy.

conclusionThe most common regular medications administered in aged care facilities were non-opioid analgesics and laxatives. Many medications were administered in the late evening, where staffing levels were likely to be limited. There was a high prevalence of polypharmacy, and non-nursing staff were involved in medication administration. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: This study offers important insights and new knowledge around use of regular medications in aged care facilities, using a nationally representative sample from Australia. It highlights the high volume of non-opioid analgesics and laxatives administered to older adults, some of which may be optimised, modified or replaced with nonpharmacological alternatives to reduce medication burden. This study also notes that not all regular medications are being administered in Australia by certified nursing staff, and that medication administration activity peaks during both breakfast and late evening rounds. These are important considerations for aged care facilities when assessing staffing ratios, rostering, and how to reduce competing demands for aged care staff. Although much attention has been placed on reducing polypharmacy and optimising medications for older adults, this study also identifies that polypharmacy is prevalent, with 78% of older adults experiencing this through use of regular medications alone. The findings of this study will enable more informed discussions between nursing staff, prescribers, pharmacy and potentially older adults and their families around regular medication and its administration in aged care facilities. REPORTING

methodThe STROBE checklist was followed. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedNursing HomesPolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective Studieslong‐term caremedication administrationmedication therapy managementnursing homesolder peopleresidential aged care

Identifiers

PMID40523868
PMCPMC12666757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.