Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40523795›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Implementing best practice for peripheral intravenous cannula use in Australian emergency departments: a stepped-wedge cluster-controlled trial and health economic analysis protocol.

Diana Egerton-Warburton, Lisa Kuhn, Joanne Enticott, Sundy Ni-Yen Yang, Paul Buntine, Emily Callander, Louise Cullen, Daniel Fatovich, Carolyn Hullick, Leah Heiss and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Diana Egerton-WarburtonEmergency Department, Monash Medical Centre Clayton, Clayton, Victoria, Australia diana.egerton-warburton@monash.edu.
Lisa KuhnMonash Emergency Research Collaborative, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-2003
Joanne EnticottMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Clayton Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-5690
Sundy Ni-Yen YangSchool of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Clayton Campus, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2418-1611
Paul BuntineEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Emily CallanderSchool of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Louise CullenRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Daniel FatovichMedical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9414-6905
Carolyn HullickAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6157-8880
Leah HeissDepartment of Design, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Gerben KeijzersSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1100-4552
Long Khanh-Dao LeSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Cathrine MihalopoulosSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-9462
Julia MorphetSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7056-6526
Gerard O'ReillySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bibesh PokhrelNeurosurgery, Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal.
Claire RickardHerston Infectious Diseases Institute, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6341-7415
Viet TranTasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-1457
Peter CameronSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Helena J TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Clayton Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver one billion adults attend emergency departments (EDs) internationally every year, including 6.6 million in Australia. Up to half of these patients have a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) inserted. Although healthcare workers believe that placing a cannula is helpful ('just in case'), PIVCs often remain idle. PIVC insertion is painful for patients, takes clinicians' attention away from other care, has adverse outcomes and causes major economic and environmental burden. Our aim is to codesign an implementation toolkit to reduce unnecessary PIVC insertions and improve other national quality indicators using an implementation science framework. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A stepped-wedge cluster-controlled trial will be conducted in nine ED sites (clusters) across Australia. The interventions will be codesigned with and adapted to sites based on local context. The interventions are evidence-based multimodal intervention (MMI) and aligned to the 2021 Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care National PIVC Clinical Care Standard. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Learning Health System will be used to guide implementation. Interventions will be phased across three steps (three sites per step), and each site will collect control and postintervention data using mainly routinely collected clinical data. Each site will be allocated to receive the intervention at one of three study steps. Implementation strategies will tailor broad clinician and consumer engagement, policy changes, education, audit and feedback and clinical champions, along with environment and equipment changes, to each site. The primary objective is to reduce the proportion of adult patients who have a PIVC inserted by 10%. We will evaluate the clinical, implementation and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.Study findings will be used to conduct a health economic analysis, develop an implementation toolkit and inform a sustainable roadmap for national roll-out. This will meet the needs of a diverse range of EDs nationally and internationally. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC Reference Number: HREC/100808/MonH-2023-390692(v3)). The outcomes of this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and communication with study partners and stakeholders including professional colleges and the Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number: ACTRN12623001248651. Date of registration: 1 December 2023. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386256&showOriginal=true&isReview=true.

Indexed as

CannulaCatheterization, PeripheralEmergency Service, HospitalAustraliaControlled Clinical Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicEmergency DepartmentsHEALTH ECONOMICSImplementation ScienceNursing CareQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID40523795
PMCPMC12198811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.