ArticleBMJ open2025
What influences preparations of discharge documentation at patient discharge? An interview study with hospital health professionals based on the theoretical domains framework.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPoor quality handover instructions prepared by hospital staff have been identified as a key threat to safe discharges. To optimise patient safety, it is important to identify and understand the influences on how discharge documentation is prepared by hospital staff. The aim of this study was to systematically identify and explore important barriers and enablers to the preparation of high-quality discharge documentation by healthcare professionals (HCPs) for primary care teams at patient discharge. SETTING AND
participantsHCPs from different staff groups (doctors, nurses, pharmacists, occupational and physiotherapists) participated in online interviews.
designSemistructured interviews informed by the theoretical domains framework (TDF), to identify key influences on the preparation of discharge documentation. Anonymised transcripts were analysed thematically using a combined inductive-deductive approach. Themes were framed as influences on the preparation of discharge documentation. The likely importance of influences was decided through iterative team discussions structured on predetermined criteria. Criteria included whether the influence was an existing enabler, whether beliefs about the influences were expressed voluntarily and how often they were mentioned.
results12 HCPs were interviewed (5 junior doctors, 1 advanced nurse practitioner, 2 nurses, 1 occupational therapist, 1 physiotherapist and 2 pharmacists). Of 44 influences identified, 10 were deemed most important in the preparation of discharge documentation, spread across five TDF domains: knowledge (eg, lack of awareness of guidelines), skills (experience of hospital staff), social and professional role and identity (effective team communication), environmental context and resources (eg, software limitations) and social influences (eg, lack of feedback).
conclusionsThis study identified 10 important influences on how discharge documentation is prepared by hospital staff. These influences are potential targets for subsequent interventions to improve the quality of discharge documentation and patient safety during discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.