ArticleBMJ open2025
Indapamide or chlorthalidone to reduce urine supersaturation for secondary prevention of kidney stones: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial (INDAPACHLOR).
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06111885 (Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Indapamide and Chlorthalidone Compared to Hydrochlorothiazide for the Reduction of Urine Supersaturation for Kidney Stone Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Indapamide and Chlorthalidone Compared to Hydrochlorothiazide for the Reduction of Urine Supersaturation for Kidney Stone Prevention
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnesium and kidney stones: a concise narrative review.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Kidney stone disease: risk factors, pathophysiology and management.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKidney stones constitute a major global healthcare problem and are characterised by high recurrence rates. Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics (thiazides) have been the standard medical treatment for the prevention of kidney stone recurrence. This clinical routine has recently been challenged by the findings of the large NOSTONE trial that failed to show superiority of hydrochlorothiazide at doses up to 50 mg daily over placebo in preventing a composite of clinical or radiological recurrence in patients at high risk of kidney stone recurrence. If these results also apply to the longer-acting and more potent thiazides indapamide and chlorthalidone remains unknown. No head-to-head comparison of different thiazides for kidney stone recurrence prevention or for the established proxies of recurrence risk, urine relative supersaturation ratios, has ever been conducted. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: INDAPACHLOR is a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of indapamide or chlorthalidone compared with hydrochlorothiazide in lowering urine relative supersaturation ratios for calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate in individuals with idiopathic calcium kidney stones. Participants will be allocated to indapamide 2.5 mg once daily, chlorthalidone 25 mg once daily and hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg once daily in a random sequence. The three consecutive active treatment periods of 28 days each will be separated by wash-out periods of 28 days. Inclusion criteria are age ≥18 years and ≥2 stone episodes in the last 10 years with calcium-containing kidney stones (containing ≥50% of calcium oxalate, calcium phosphate or a mixture of both). Patients with secondary causes of calcium kidney stones are excluded. The primary outcomes are the changes in the relative supersaturation ratios of calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate from baseline to day 28 of each treatment period. Secondary outcomes include changes in 24 hours urine and blood parameters from baseline to day 28 of each treatment period. The study targets enrolment of 99 participants to achieve 80% power for detecting a 20% reduction in the relative supersaturation ratios of calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate when treated with indapamide or chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Commission Bern, Switzerland, and the Competent Authority Swissmedic. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06111885) and Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP000006156). PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 4.0, 29 November 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.