ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
Artificial Intelligence-Based Hospital Malnutrition Screening: Validation of a Novel Machine Learning Model.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Nutrition: Current Uses, Challenges, and Opportunities.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Review
- 'Malnutrition Receives High Priority': Nurses' Experiences in Providing Nutritional Support in Hospitalized Patients-A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Development and internal-external validation of a nomogram for predicting postoperative 30-day malnutrition risk in cervical cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite its morbidity, mortality, and financial burden, in-hospital malnutrition remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising clinical informatics solution for identifying malnutrition risk and one that can be coupled with clinician-delivered patient care.The objectives of the study were to evaluate an AI-based hospital malnutrition screening model in a large and diverse inpatient population and to compare it to the currently used clinician-delivered malnutrition screening tool.We studied the performance of a gradient-boosted decision tree model incorporating a large language model (LLM) for feature extraction using the electronic medical record data of 106,449 patients over 3.75 years.The model's area under the receiver operating curve was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-0.92) on the first day of hospitalization and rose to 0.95 (95% CI: 0.95-0.96) using the maximum risk predicted for each patient throughout hospitalization, indexed against discharge-coded malnutrition. Similar results were observed when indexed against dietitian-recorded malnutrition. The model outperformed the nurse-administered, modified version of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) that was used in practice. Patients identified by the model had higher likelihoods of readmission and death compared with patients identified by the nurse-administered screener.Our study findings provide validation for a novel model's use in the prediction of in-hospital malnutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.