ArticleJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2025
Communicating the ethical, legal, and social issues in neurobiobanking and stroke genomic research in Africa: Project intervention tools development and evaluation procedures.
Article in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimIssues concerning appropriate Community Engagement (CE) and communication of research outcomes with stakeholders have received the attention of scholars in different sub-fields of clinical research. However, given its novel nature, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, CE addressing the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of neurobiobanking and stroke genomic research has not received much scholarly attention. Therefore, this study was designed as a pioneering effort to report the procedures for developing and evaluating intervention tools for the CE component of the African Neurobiobank for Precision Stroke Medicine ELSI Project.
methodsA community-based participatory research design was adopted. The intervention tools we developed include general advocacy, educative, and training videos focusing on neurobiobanking, stroke genomics and precision stroke medicine in Africa; infographics; and a policy brief. An adapted Doak and Doak's Suitability Assessment Measure (SAM), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and semi-structured interview questions based on Willis' Cognitive Interviewing Techniques were used to evaluate the suitability, actionability, understandability and cultural appropriateness of the tools.
resultsPEMAT mean percentage scores of 71.4 % for actionability and 82.4 % for understandability, and a SAM suitability score of 67.9 % were reported for the videos. Identified weaknesses captured in seven thematic areas after assessment analysis by experts and community members guided the final refinement of the tools.
conclusionThe overall reviewers' reports and evaluation scores indicate that the intervention tools are generally suitable for community deployment in sub-Saharan Africa. Clinical researchers must partner with key stakeholders, define policy objectives and desired behaviour change, and develop appropriate persuasive communication strategies and tools for community engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.