Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40523168›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Collective cooperative intelligence.

Wolfram Barfuss, Jessica Flack, Chaitanya S Gokhale, Lewis Hammond, Christian Hilbe, Edward Hughes, Joel Z Leibo, Tom Lenaerts, Naomi Leonard, Simon Levin and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. On the optimal integration of intelligent agents into network systems to steer cooperation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Collective artificial intelligence and evolutionary dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wolfram BarfussArgelander-Chair Integrated System Modeling for Sustainability Transitions, Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Bonn 53113, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9077-5242
Jessica FlackSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501.
Chaitanya S GokhaleMax-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5749-3665
Lewis HammondDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, OX1 3QD Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1695-0871
Christian HilbeMax-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5116-955X
Edward HughesGoogle DeepMind, N1C 4DN London, United Kingdom.
Joel Z LeiboGoogle DeepMind, N1C 4DN London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3153-916X
Tom LenaertsMachine Learning Group, Département d'Informatique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-1455
Naomi LeonardDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-5328-3871
Simon LevinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-8216-5639
Udari Madhushani SehwagDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-1000
Alex McAvoySchool of Data Science and Society, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.ORCID 0000-0002-9110-4635
Janusz M MeylahnDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-805X
Fernando P SantosFaculty of Science, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2310-6444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperation at scale is critical for achieving a sustainable future for humanity. However, achieving collective, cooperative behavior-in which intelligent actors in complex environments jointly improve their well-being-remains poorly understood. Complex systems science (CSS) provides a rich understanding of collective phenomena, the evolution of cooperation, and the institutions that can sustain both. Yet, much of the theory in this area fails to fully consider individual-level complexity and environmental context-largely for the sake of tractability and because it has not been clear how to do so rigorously. These elements are well captured in multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL), which has recently put focus on cooperative (artificial) intelligence. However, typical MARL simulations can be computationally expensive and challenging to interpret. In this perspective, we propose that bridging CSS and MARL affords new directions forward. Both fields can complement each other in their goals, methods, and scope. MARL offers CSS concrete ways to formalize cognitive processes in dynamic environments. CSS offers MARL improved qualitative insight into emergent collective phenomena. We see this approach as providing the necessary foundations for a proper science of collective, cooperative intelligence. We highlight work that is already heading in this direction and discuss concrete steps for future research.

Indexed as

collective actioncomplex systems sciencecooperationmultiagent reinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID40523168
PMCPMC12207418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.