ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2025
Perfusion practices and safety standards in Pakistan: Insights from a preliminary nationwide survey.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPerfusion safety in cardiothoracic surgery is critical, particularly in Pakistan where variability in practice standards exists. This survey investigates the current perfusion practices among Pakistani perfusionists, focusing on the adherence to safety standards during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures.
methodsThe survey was conducted over two weeks to explore key areas of perfusion practice, including the use of bubble detectors, level detectors, arterial filters, and saturation monitoring during CPB procedures. Out of approximately 350 practicing perfusionists in Pakistan, 66 responded, resulting in a response rate of 18.9%. The data was collected through an online platform, ensuring anonymity and voluntary participation. The survey included mainly Yes/No questions. To ensure reliability and validity, the questionnaire was reviewed by experts, pilot tested, and refined based on feedback, ensuring it was effective in gathering meaningful insights.
resultsThe survey results indicate a variable use of essential safety devices such as bubble and level detectors, arterial filters, and continuous venous saturation and cerebral saturation monitoring. While some perfusionists adhere to recommended safety protocols, gaps in the use of critical monitoring equipment were evident.
conclusionThe findings highlight the need for standardized perfusion practices in Pakistan to ensure safety and efficacy during CPB. Addressing the gaps in the use of safety and monitoring equipment could lead to improved patient outcomes. Further research is needed to explore the barriers to uniform safety standards and to develop strategies for enhancing perfusion safety across the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.