Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40523130›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025

Real-time cardiac cine MRI: A comparison of a diffusion probabilistic model with alternative state-of-the-art image reconstruction techniques for undersampled spiral acquisitions.

Oliver Schad, Julius Frederik Heidenreich, Nils Petri, Jonas Kleineisel, Simon Sauer, Thorsten Alexander Bley, Peter Nordbeck, Bernhard Petritsch, Tobias Wech

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Oliver SchadDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0646-8293
Julius Frederik HeidenreichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0683-7982
Nils PetriDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Jonas KleineiselDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3819-204X
Simon SauerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Thorsten Alexander BleyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Peter NordbeckDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2560-4068
Bernhard PetritschDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Tobias WechDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2813-7100

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 05M20WKAInterdisziplinäres Zentrum für Klinische Forschung, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg F-437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeElectrocardiogram (ECG)-gated cine imaging in breath-hold enables high-quality diagnostics in most patients but can be compromised by arrhythmia and inability to hold breath. Real-time cardiac MRI offers faster and robust exams without these limitations. To achieve sufficient acceleration, advanced reconstruction methods, which transfer data into high-quality images, are required.

methodsIn this study, undersampled spiral balanced SSFP (bSSFP) real-time data in free-breathing were acquired at 1.5T in 16 healthy volunteers and five arrhythmic patients, with ECG-gated Cartesian cine in breath-hold serving as clinical reference. Image reconstructions were performed using a tailored and specifically trained score-based diffusion model, compared to a variational network and different compressed sensing approaches. The techniques were assessed using an expert reader study, scalar metric calculations, difference images against a segmented reference, and Bland-Altman analysis of cardiac functional parameters.

resultsIn participants with irregular RR-cycles, spiral real-time acquisitions showed superior image quality compared to the clinical reference. Quantitative and qualitative metrics indicate enhanced image quality of the diffusion model in comparison to the alternative reconstruction methods, although improvements over the variational network were minor. Slightly higher ejection fractions for the real-time diffusion reconstructions were exhibited relative to the clinical references with a bias of 1.1 ± 5.7% for healthy subjects.

conclusionThe proposed real-time technique enables free-breathing acquisitions of spatio-temporal images with high quality, covering the entire heart in less than 1 min. Evaluation of ejection fraction using the ECG-gated reference can be vulnerable to arrhythmia and averaging effects, highlighting the need for real-time approaches. Prolonged inference times and stochastic variability of the diffusion reconstruction represent obstacles to overcome for clinical translation.

Indexed as

HeartImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAdultAlgorithmsArrhythmias, CardiacBreath HoldingCardiac-Gated Imaging TechniquesElectrocardiographyFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedModels, Statisticalcardiac imagingdiffusion modelsheartmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingvariational network

Identifiers

PMID40523130
PMCPMC12309890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.