ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Employing transfer learning for breast cancer detection using deep learning models.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Model for Ultrasound Image-Based Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using EfficientNet-V2 and Vision Transformer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a critical global health concern, affecting countless lives worldwide. Early and accurate detection plays a vital role in improving patient outcomes. The challenge lies with the limitations of traditional diagnostic methods in terms of accuracy. This study proposes a novel model based on the four pretrained deep learning models, Mobilenetv2, Inceptionv3, ResNet50, and VGG16, which were also used as feature extractors and fed on multiple supervised learning models using the BUSI dataset. Mobiletnetv2, inceptionv3, ResNet50 and VGG16 achieved an accuracy of 85.6%, 90.8%, 89.7% and 88.06%, respectively, with Logistic Regression and Light Gradient Boosting Machine being the best performing classifiers. Using transfer learning, the top layers of the model were frozen, and additional layers were added. A GlobalAveragePooling2D layer was employed to reduce spatial dimensions of the input image. After training and testing based on the accuracy, ResNet50 performed the best with 95.5%, followed by Inceptionv3 92.5%, VGG16 86.5% and lastly Mobilenetv2 84%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.