Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40523014›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

Monkeyflower (Mimulus) uncovers the evolutionary basis of the eukaryote telomere sequence variation.

Surbhi Kumawat, Askhan Shametov, Liia R Valeeva, Yoonha Ju, Irene Martinez, Dhenugen Logeswaran, Hongfei Chen, Jenn M Coughlan, Julian J-L Chen, Yao-Wu Yuan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Surbhi KumawatDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Askhan ShametovDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5529-8500
Liia R ValeevaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, United States of America.
Yoonha JuDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9792-2041
Irene MartinezDepartment of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, New York, United States of America.
Dhenugen LogeswaranSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3522-3883
Hongfei ChenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Jenn M CoughlanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Julian J-L ChenSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-2722
Yao-Wu YuanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1376-0028
James M SobelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-7926
Dal-Hoe KooDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Eugene V ShakirovDepartment of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, United States of America.
Jae Young ChoiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0238-8980

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Douglas E Wright · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
Synthetic Chemical Biology CoreP30GM145499 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI Susan M Lunte · 2022 to 2026
$6.9M
Genetic and epigenetic architecture of natural telomere length variationR01GM127402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SHAKIROV, EUGENE V · 2018 to 2025
$2.4M
Molecular mechanisms and evolution of natural telomeric variationR35GM154595 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI Jae Young Choi · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM145499NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127402NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM154595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telomeres are nucleoprotein complexes with crucial role of protecting chromosome ends. Because of its vital functions, components of the telomere, including its sequence, should be under strong evolutionary constraint. Yet across the tree of life there are numerous examples of telomere sequence variation and the evolutionary mechanism driving this diversification is unclear. Here, we studied the telomeres in Mimulus by investigating the noncoding telomerase RNA (TR), which is a core component of the telomere maintenance complex and determines the telomere sequence in eukaryotes. We conducted de novo transcriptomics and genome analysis of 18 species, and discovered Mimulus has evolved at least three different telomere sequences: (AAACCCT)n, (AAACCCG)n, and (AAACCG)n. We discovered several species with TR duplications, implying functional consequences that could influence telomere evolution. For instance, M. lewisii harbored two sequence-divergent TR paralogs while its sister species the paralog had pseudogenized. Nanopore-sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization indicated M. lewisii had a sequence heterogeneous telomere, and Telomeric Repeat Amplification Protocol combined with Terminal Restriction Fragment analysis confirmed the telomerase can use both TR paralogs for telomere synthesis. Interestingly in closely related species M. cardinalis, TR was also duplicated and both paralogs were expressed but its telomere consisted of a single telomere repeat. Evolutionary analysis indicated the TR paralogs arose from an ancient duplication, which also underlies the evolutionary origin of multiple Mimulus species with divergent telomere sequences. We propose sequence variation in eukaryotic telomeres arises from an evolutionary process involving TR duplication, sequence divergence, and loss of TR paralog.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularTelomereEukaryotaGenetic VariationIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePhylogenyRNATelomeraseTranscriptomeRNATelomerasetelomerase RNA

Identifiers

PMID40523014
PMCPMC12169523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.