ArticlePloS one2025
TBpore cluster: A novel phylogenetic pipeline for tuberculosis transmission studies using nanopore next-generation sequencing data.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMolecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates enhances understanding of tuberculosis (TB) transmission dynamics, supporting public health efforts in outbreak investigations. This study aims to validate TBpore, a novel bioinformatic pipeline for clustering TB transmission isolates using Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) data and comparing it against conventional Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive-Unit Variable Number (MIRU-VNTR) typing and Illumina sequencing. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThis retrospective case-control study included 58 clinical isolates from two TB outbreaks in Canada, previously characterized by public health investigations and MIRU-VNTR typing. DNA extraction and sequencing were performed on both Illumina and ONT platforms. Illumina data were processed using Clockwork and psdm, while Nanopore data were analyzed with TBpore. SNP distances were used to compare clustering results across methods, with clusters defined by SNP distance thresholds of ≤5 and ≤12. Both sequencing methods showed a high degree of concordance in clustering results. All isolates from the M. africanum outbreak clustered within the defined SNP thresholds, consistent with MIRU-VNTR and epidemiological data. In the M. tuberculosis outbreak, 20 out of 21 isolates clustered similarly across methods, with one exception. Within outbreak pairwise SNP distances were lower with Nanopore. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: ONT sequencing and the TBpore pipeline offer an accurate alternative to Illumina technology for TB molecular epidemiology. This study suggests potential increased clustering sensitivity with Nanopore technology, warranting further validation on larger datasets with robust epidemiological metadata.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.