ArticlePLoS biology2025
Precise spike-timing information in the brainstem is well aligned with the needs of communication and the perception of environmental sounds.
Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking hierarchy: the auditory system as an integrated cortical-subcortical network.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dynamic fluctuations in the amplitude of sound, known as sound envelopes, are ubiquitous in natural sounds and convey information critical for the recognition of speech, and of sounds generally. We are perceptually most sensitive to slow modulations which are most common. However, previous studies of envelope coding in the brainstem found an under-representation of these slow, low-frequency, modulations. Specifically, the synchronization of spike times to the envelope was enhanced in some neuron types, forming channels specialized for envelope processing but tuned to a restricted range of fast, high-frequency, envelopes (200-500 Hz). Here, we show using a historical dataset from cats that previous analyses, which made strong assumptions about the neural code, underestimated the encoding of low-frequency envelopes. While some neurons encode envelope better than others, most encode a wide range of envelope frequencies, and represent slower envelope fluctuations most accurately in their precise patterns of spike times. Identification of envelope frequency from spike-timing was linked to reliability, and to the way that dynamics of spiking interacted with the time-varying envelope. In some of the best-performing neurons, temporally complex "mode-locked" spike patterns served to enhance envelope coding. A second long-standing contradiction was that neural envelope coding is degraded at high sound levels, whilst the perception of envelope is robust at a wide range of sound levels. We find that spike-time encoding of envelope shape becomes level-robust for small populations of neurons. These findings argue against feature-specific coding of envelopes in the brainstem, and for a distributed population spike-time code for which synchrony to the envelope is an incomplete description. This code is accurate for slow fluctuations and robust across sound level. Thus, precise spike-timing information in the brainstem is after-all aligned with the needs of communication and the perception of environmental sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.