ArticlePloS one2025
Clonal integration and Bacillus subtilis modulate Glechoma longituba performance and soil microbial communities.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effects of clonal integration and earthworms on the growth, active constituent accumulation inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many medicinal plants exhibit clonality, but the impact of clonal integration and its interaction with exogenous microbial agents on these plants remains unknown. In order to investigate this, we conducted a greenhouse experiment using Glechoma longituba, a common clonal medicinal herb. Pairs of connected ramets were grown in the two adjacent pots, with one pot containing basal (relatively older) ramets treated with or without Bacillus subtilis agent and the other pot containing apical (relatively younger) ramets without B. subtilis agent treatment, the connection between basal and apical ramets were either left intact or severed. Clonal integration reduced the growth of basal ramets, but increased the apical ramet growth. B. subtilis agent primarily affected the root-shoot ratio of both basal and apical ramets as well as the whole fragments. Furthermore, it exhibited a significant interaction with clonal integration in affecting the root-shoot ratio of basal ramets and whole plant fragments. Addition of B. subtilis reduced the content of total flavonoids and chlorogenic acid in basal portions and chlorogenic acid at the whole fragment level. Clonal integration and B. subtilis agent significantly changed the composition of soil fungal communities of basal portions and bacterial communities of apical portions. The fungal composition of basal portions responded reciprocally to clonal integration and B. subtilis, with a significant increase in the relative abundance of Basidiomycota and a decrease in Ascomycota under clonal integration, whereas the effect of B. subtilis was opposite. B. subtilis significantly increased fungal diversity in basal portions while decreasing bacterial diversity in apical portions under clonal integration. However, neither clonal integration nor B. subtilis has showed a positive effect on the overall growth and quality of G. longituba. These findings provide valuable insights into its role in scientific cultivation and management of the clonal medicinal plants in the practical production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.