ArticlePloS one2025
RRFNet: A free-anchor brain tumor detection and classification network based on reparameterization technology.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in medical imaging technology have facilitated the acquisition of high-quality brain images through computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), enabling professional brain specialists to diagnose brain tumors more effectively. However, manual diagnosis is time-consuming, which has led to the growing importance of automatic detection and classification through brain imaging. Conventional object detection models for brain tumor detection face limitations in brain tumor detection owing to the significant differences between medical images and natural scene images, as well as challenges such as complex backgrounds, noise interference, and blurred boundaries between cancerous and normal tissues. This study investigates the application of deep learning to brain tumor detection, analyzing the effect of three factors, the number of model parameters, input data batch size, and the use of anchor boxes, on detection performance. Experimental results reveal that an excessive number of model parameters or the use of anchor boxes may reduce detection accuracy. However, increasing the number of brain tumor samples improves detection performance. This study, introduces a backbone network built using RepConv and RepC3, along with FGConcat feature map splicing module to optimize the brain tumor detection model. The experimental results show that the proposed RepConv-RepC3-FGConcat Network (RRFNet) can learn underlying semantic information about brain tumors during training stage, while maintaining a low number of parameters during inference, which improves the speed of brain tumor detection. Compared with YOLOv8, RRFNet achieved a higher accuracy in brain tumor detection, with a mAP value of 79.2%. This optimized approach enhances both accuracy and efficiency, which is essential in clinical settings where time and precision are critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.