Trial reportPloS one2025
The effects of integrating the Manchester Pain Management Model and empowerment education on postoperative rehabilitation after cesarean section: A comprehensive intervention study.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effect of combining the Manchester Pain Management Model (MPMM) with the enabling education model as a comprehensive intervention in maternal rehabilitation after cesarean section.
methodsA total of 120 women who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from June 2021 to June 2023 were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group received standard nursing measures, while the observation group received comprehensive nursing measures combined with Manchester pain management and enabling education model. A rigorous randomized controlled trial design was employed. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables, with a significance level set at P < 0.05. Postoperative pain degree (VAS score), postoperative recovery indicators, and nursing satisfaction scores were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe pain scores at 4 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours after surgery, the first independent time out of bed activity, the first time to exhaust gas and the length of hospital stay in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05), and the success rate of the first breastfeeding and nursing satisfaction were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.01).
conclusionThe combined intervention of the Manchester pain management model and empowerment education significantly improved postoperative pain control, accelerated physiological recovery, and increased overall satisfaction with nursing care. This model may provide an effective new method for rehabilitation management after clinical cesarean section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.