Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522660›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Goals-of-Care Conversations in Veterans Health Administration Clinics.

Amy M Linsky, Benjamin E Canter, Mark Glickman, Shirley Qian, Samantha K Ryan, Michael Still, Terri R Fried, Renda Soylemez Wiener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amy M Linsky *Center for Health Optimization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Benjamin E Canter *Center for Health Optimization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark GlickmanCenter for Health Optimization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shirley QianCenter for Health Optimization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Samantha K RyanCenter for Health Optimization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael StillCenter for Health Optimization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Terri R FriedPain, Research, Informatics, Multi-Morbidities, and Education Center, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven.
Renda Soylemez WienerCenter for Health Optimization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Lauren Ferrante · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
HSRD VA I01 HX003307NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic created urgency for advance care planning, including documenting goals-of-care conversations (GoCCs), while seismically disrupting usual health care delivery. Characterizing trends in GoCC rates during the pandemic can provide insight into the extent to which health care systems prioritized advance care planning in the face of competing clinical demands, shifts to telemedicine, and staffing shortages. Objective: To determine how the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with changes in outpatient first-ever GoCCs. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of patients eligible for their first-ever documented GoCC in outpatient clinics at 123 US Veterans Health Administration facilities nationwide from March 2019 to February 2023. Exposure: COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcomes and Measures: National- and facility-level weekly GoCC rates, defined as number of first-ever documented GoCCs per 100 000 outpatient appointments. Secondary analyses examined associations between facility-level characteristics and facility GoCC rates. Results: Of 5 027 956 patients nationally, 124 216 (2.5%) had a first-ever outpatient GoCC during the study period (facility-level range: 0.01%-26.3%). The mean (SD) weekly national first-ever outpatient GoCC rate was 99.6 (12.1) in the year preceding the pandemic. At pandemic onset, mean weekly outpatient GoCC rates dropped to a nadir of 74.1 (week of March 21, 2020), then sharply increased, peaking at 177.4 (week of April 18, 2020), before steadily declining to pre-COVID-19 rates and ending with a COVID year 3 mean (SD) of 96.6 (11.5). At the facility level, 29 of 123 facilities (23.6%) significantly increased outpatient GoCC rates in the early pandemic and maintained or further improved through COVID year 3, with significant rate increases pre-COVID to COVID year 3. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of outpatient GoCC rates, the early COVID-19 pandemic was associated with initial disruption and then with increased first-ever outpatient GoCC rates nationally. Despite unprecedented challenges to health care delivery, several facilities increased GoCC rates during the first COVID-19 surge and maintained increased rates through 2023. These facilities could serve as models for best practices to improve advance care planning.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCOVID-19AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans

Identifiers

PMID40522660
PMCPMC12171934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.