Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522623›Full record

ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2025

Efficacy of CDK4/6 Inhibition in colorectal cancer and the role of p16 expression in predicting drug resistance.

Julia S Schneider, Najib Ben Khaled, Liangtao Ye, Ralf Wimmer, Linda Hammann, Alexander Weich, Christoph Suppan, Ujjwal M Mahajan, Andreas Jung, Jörg Kumbrink and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Julia S SchneiderDepartment of Medicine II, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany. Julia.Schneider@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Najib Ben KhaledDepartment of Medicine II, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Liangtao YeDepartment of Medicine II, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ralf WimmerDepartment of Medicine II, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Linda HammannDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander WeichDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Christoph SuppanDepartment of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Ujjwal M MahajanDepartment of Medicine II, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas JungInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jörg KumbrinkInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gerald DenkDepartment of Medicine II, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Monika RauDivision of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Volker KunzmannDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Solveig KussInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens NeumanInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julia MayerleDepartment of Medicine II, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas GeierDivision of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Heike M HermannsDivision of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Enrico N De ToniDepartment of Medicine II, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian P ReiterDivision of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3807-1456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The use of sequential polychemotherapies has improved the survival of patients with advanced metastatic disease. However, the survival rates achieved are low, and chemotherapy-related side effects are significant. Therefore, new, efficient, and tolerable therapies are urgently needed. In this study, we investigate the efficacy of pharmacological cyclin D-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibition and explore the relevance of p16 as predictors of susceptibility to CDK 4/6 therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsCDK 4/6 inhibitors were evaluated in native and FOLFOX- or ribociclib-resistant CRC, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and breast cancer (BC) cell lines using viability, colony formation, and flow cytometry (FC)-based assays. Western blotting was employed to assess the expression of Rb and members of the INK4 family. SiRNA-based knockdown of CDK4/6 was utilized to gain insights into mechanisms of action or resistance. Tissue from 185 CRC patients was examined for the expression of p16 and its relevance for progression-free and overall survival. The prognostic relevance of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2 A (CDKN2A) mRNA expression data was derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data.

resultsRibociclib demonstrates significant antitumoral effects in various CRC, HCC, and BC cell lines, similar to two other approved CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib and abemaciclib). Ribociclib-resistant cell lines (Hep-3B, HCC-1937, and BT-549) exhibited higher p16 expression compared to ribociclib-sensitive cell lines. In ribociclib-sensitive cell lines, CDK4/6 inhibition led to G1 phase arrest, whereas resistant cells did not exhibit such effects. A similar phenotype could be observed upon dual siRNA based CDK4/6 knockdown in ribociclib-sensitive HuH-7 and ribociclib-resistant Hep-3B cell lines. All CRC cell lines tested showed sensitivity to ribociclib, including the FOLFOX-resistant SW620 cell line. Low mRNA expression of CDKN2A (p16) was associated with favorable prognosis in CRC patients. No prognostic significance was found for p16 protein expression in an early-stage CRC cohort (n = 185).

conclusionRibociclib demonstrates significant antitumoral effects across a large panel of cancer cell lines and chemoresistant models, especially in CRC. Resistance towards ribociclib is associated with high p16 expression, which is a negative prognostic marker for patients with CRC. Our findings underscore p16 as a promising biomarker for predicting ribociclib responsiveness and emphasize the need for further mechanistic studies and combination therapy approaches to overcome resistance in p16

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Drug Resistance, NeoplasmProtein Kinase InhibitorsAminopyridinesCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisPurinesAminopyridinesCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Protein Kinase InhibitorsPurinesPyridinesribociclibCDK4/6 InhibitionColorectal cancerp16 expression

Identifiers

PMID40522623
PMCPMC12528337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.