Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522593›Full record

ReviewJournal of fluorescence2025

Fluorescent Metal-Organic Frameworks for the Detection of Explosive Materials: Current Trends and Future Prospects.

Chintan Parmar, Riya Khandelwal, Mahesh Vasava

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fluorescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chintan ParmarSchool of Pharmacy, National Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Riya KhandelwalSchool of Pharmacy, National Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Mahesh VasavaSchool of Pharmacy, National Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. mahesh.vasava@nfsu.ac.in.

Funding

University Grants Commission UGC-JRF [220520203927}
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) show exceptional potential for the selective detection of hazardous analytes, including explosives, chemical warfare agents, industrial toxins, and other dangerous forensic analytes. Traditional instrumental techniques for trace explosive detection are often costly and inaccessible, creating a need for alternative solutions. MOFs offer a feasible approach through a fluorescence quenching mechanism, leveraging their tunable porosity and extensive surface area to interact specifically with nitroaromatic compounds/explosives., enabling detectable changes in fluorescence. This innovative methodology shows great potential to amplify explosive detection technologies' accessibility and efficiency. However, various challenges remain the same, such as enhancing selectivity, limit of detection, and operational stability of MOFs. This review highlights the recent advancements in MOFs-based detection strategies for nitro compounds and explosives, highlighting their advantages, challenges, limitations, and future scopes without focusing on any specific compound or detection mechanism. By addressing these limitations, MOFs can further strengthen their role in enhancing rapid and reliable detection methods for hazardous analytes.

Indexed as

DetectionExplosivesFluorescence quenchingMetal–organic frameworks (MOFs)Nitroaromatic compounds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.