ArticleThe ultrasound journal2025
Efficacy of a theoretical-practical course for the ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve diameter in different healthcare operators.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Point-of-care ultrasonography for detecting raised intracranial pressure through optic nerve sheath diameter in non-traumatic headache patients.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Correction: Efficacy of a theoretical-practical course for the ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve diameter in different healthcare operators.The ultrasound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) via ultrasound is a non-invasive technique to estimate intracranial pressure. Brief training has been shown to be effective in accurately teaching the ONSD technique in specialized healthcare providers. This study evaluates the ability of medical and nursing students, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses, and ICU residents to perform ONSD measurements after a brief training.
methodsForty participants underwent a 4-h training session consisting of 30 min of lecture focusing on the key principles of the technique for ONSD measurement, followed by at least 20 measurements with an expert tutor. Thereafter, all participants assessed 5 ONSD measurements on healthy volunteers and their assessments were compared to those by the expert tutor.
resultsAll participants successfully visualized the optic nerve and recorded similar values among groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). ICU nurse residents and medical students demonstrated a good accuracyof measurements, as defined by an upper and lower limits of agreement with the expert tutor not exceeding 0.5 mm in the Bland-Altman analysis. On the opposite, nurse students had the highest error rates and poor accuracy in ONSD assessment.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the feasibility of training medical students, ICU nurses and residents in ONSD measurement, opening the possibility of a wider application of this technique. After dedicated training, ONSD assessment and monitoring could be performed not only by specialists but also by other healthcare providers, including specialized nurses. This may serve as an additional tool for the rapid triage of patients, even in out-of-hospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.