ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2025
Changes in proximal colon on intestinal ultrasound indicate the efficacy of induction therapy for active ulcerative colitis.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to elucidate the effectiveness of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in assessing induction therapy for active ulcerative colitis (UC).
methodsThirty-two patients (12 with severe colitis and 20 with moderate colitis) were analyzed. Disease activity was assessed using the Mayo endoscopic score (MES) obtained via colonoscopy. Ultrasound (US) grade and bowel wall thickness (BWT) before induction therapy were compared in terms of MES. Changes in US grade and BWT from pre-treatment to clinical improvement were analyzed at the most inflamed segments, oral side, and anal side.
resultsA correlation coefficient of 0.58 (p < 0.01) indicated a strong correlation between US grade and MES. US grade and BWT decreased at the most inflamed segments, oral side, and anal side for clinical improvement in all cases (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively). However, changes in US grade were significantly greater on the oral side than the most inflamed segments or the anal side (p = 0.008 and p = 0.039, respectively).
conclusionIUS is an effective method for assessing the efficacy of induction therapy for active UC. The assessment should be performed at the proximal part of the colon, rather than solely at the site of the most pronounced inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.