ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Early detection and staging of retinitis pigmentosa using multifocal electroretinogram parameters and machine learning algorithms.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Interpretation of Electroretinography (ERG) Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based analysis of visual electrophysiological signals for clinical interpretation support.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinitis pigmentosa is an inherited retinal disease caused by damage to photoreceptor cells. Diagnosis and staging of this disease are crucial for early intervention and effective treatment planning. In this study, the amplitude and latency features of N1, P1, and N2 waves obtained from multifocal electroretinogram responses over five rings were used with binary and multiclass classification methods using four different machine learning algorithms to distinguish retinitis pigmentosa patients from healthy individuals and to evaluate the stages of the disease. Binary classifications were performed for six different groups, and the Naive Bayes (NB) algorithm performed the best on all evaluation metrics, achieving 99% accuracy in distinguishing healthy individuals from each disease stage. Furthermore, multiclass classification was applied in two different steps. In the first step, the Naive Bayes model achieved 82% accuracy in four-class classification, including healthy individuals. Considering the near-perfect separability of healthy individuals, in the second step, a three-class classification including only disease stages was performed, and the model achieved 76% accuracy. These results indicate that the proposed approach provides objective and accurate staging for retinitis pigmentosa and can serve as a valuable decision support system to assist ophthalmologists in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.