SynthesisPediatric surgery international2025
The need for screening recommendations after intestinal vaginal replacement: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the occurrence, presentation, management, and treatment of patients found to have a primary colorectal malignancy arising in the intestinal neovagina.
methodsA systematic review of primary research studies describing intestinal malignancy arising in an intestinal neovagina was conducted. Reports of extraintestinal malignancy and secondary research study designs were excluded.
resultsSixteen case reports were identified over 35 years. Patients commonly had sigmoid (n = 11, 69%) neovaginas. Indications for vaginal reconstruction included Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome (n = 5, 31%), gynecologic carcinoma (n = 3, 19%), vaginal agenesis (n = 5, 31%) and cloaca (n = 3, 19%). Symptom onset ranged from 7 to 53 years after reconstruction. Age at diagnosis ranged from 17 to 53 years. Bleeding was the most common presenting symptom (n = 12, 73%). Fifty percent of patients presented with local disease (n = 8), 31% with locoregional (n = 5) and 6% with metastasis (n = 1). Treatment varied with most patients undergoing surgical resection. Survival was reported for 10 patients, half of which experienced disease recurrence. Surveillance plans were rarely described.
conclusionAdenocarcinoma in intestinal neovaginas is a rare but life-threatening disease that lacks routine screening, management and surveillance guidelines. Our findings underscore the variability in management of these patients, and the morbidity of the disease. Work to develop formalized screening guidelines is ongoing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40522524What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.