Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522511›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2025

Molecular survey of Anaplasmataceae agents, piroplasmids and haemosporidians in seabirds (Procellariiformes and Sphenisciformes) rescued on the Brazilian coast.

Dália Monique Ribeiro Machado, Daniel Antônio Braga Lee, Lorena Freitas das Neves, Carolina Pacheco Bertozzi, Vanessa Lanes Ribeiro, Alice Pereira, Giovana Almeida Reis, Jovêncio Mateus Sada, João Vitor Dos Santos Alves da Silva, Anna Claudia Baumel Mongruel and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diversity of piroplasmids in wild animals in Brazil: a review.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dália Monique Ribeiro MachadoVector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Daniel Antônio Braga LeeVector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Lorena Freitas das NevesVector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Carolina Pacheco BertozziInstitute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University, São Vicente, SP, Brazil.
Vanessa Lanes RibeiroBiopesca Institute - IBP, Praia Grande, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alice PereiraAlbatross Project - Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Giovana Almeida ReisVector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Jovêncio Mateus SadaVector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
João Vitor Dos Santos Alves da SilvaVector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Anna Claudia Baumel MongruelVector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Amir Salvador Alabí CórdovaVector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Rosangela Zacarias MachadoVector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Luis Antonio MathiasLaboratory for the Diagnosis of Leptospirosis and Brucellosis, Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Marcos Rogério AndréVector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. mr.andre@unesp.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303701/2021-8Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/08543-2Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2023/06102-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the occurrence and molecular identity of piroplasmids, haemosporidians and Anaplasmataceae agents in Procelariiformes birds and Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) rescued in different coastal regions of Brazil. Between 2015 and 2022, blood samples (n = 52) from twelve species of Procelariiformes and spleen (n = 170) and blood samples (n = 30) from Magellanic penguins were collected in the coasts of Santa Catarina and São Paulo states, southern and southeastern Brazil, respectively. After DNA extraction, samples positive in a PCR for the avian endogenous β-actin gene were subjected to further PCR assays aiming to detect and molecularly characterize piroplasmids (18S rRNA), haemosporidians (cytochrome B) and Anaplasmataceae agents (16S rRNA, dsb, groEL, gltA, sodB, omp-1, msp-4, msp-5 genes and 23S-5S rRNA intergenic region). As a result, 13/252 (5.1%) samples of S. magellanicus (blood = 10/170 (5.8%) and spleen = 3/30 (10%)) were positive for Anaplasma spp. in a nested-PCR based on the 16S rRNA gene. Two sequences obtained from spleen samples were phylogenetically related to A. phagocytophilum and clustered with Anaplasma sp. sequences previously detected in birds and A. phagocytophilum previously detected in ticks. All samples were negative for haemospordians and piroplasmids. In conclusion, Anaplasma genotypes, closely related to A. phagocytophilum, circulate in penguins that arrive in the Brazilian coast, while haemosporidian and piroplasmids infections do not seem to be prevalent vector-borne protozoa in seabirds.

Indexed as

AnaplasmataceaeAnaplasmataceae InfectionsBird DiseasesHaemosporidaPiroplasmidaProtozoan Infections, AnimalSpheniscidaeAnimalsBirdsBrazilPhylogenyAlbatrossesAnaplasma spp.Haemoproteus spp.Leucocytozoon spp.PenguinsPlasmodium spp

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.