Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522510›Full record

SynthesisVeterinary research communications2025

Epidemiology and control strategies for foot-and-mouth disease in livestock and wildlife in Uganda: systematic review.

Benedicto Byamukama, Asfor Amin, Frank Nobert Mwiine, Abel Bulamu Ekiri

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benedicto ByamukamaDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Daphene Jackson Road, Guildford, GU2 7AL, UK.
Asfor AminDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Daphene Jackson Road, Guildford, GU2 7AL, UK.
Frank Nobert MwiineSchool of Biosecurity, Biotechnical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Abel Bulamu EkiriDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Daphene Jackson Road, Guildford, GU2 7AL, UK. ab.ekiri@surrey.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) remains a persistent threat to the livestock sector in Uganda and globally. To understand the reasons for continued FMD outbreaks in Uganda, a systematic review was conducted to examine FMD epidemiology, control strategies, and related challenges. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for the period 1958-2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Additionally, FMD reports for the same period were retrieved from the World Reference Laboratories for FMD and the World Organization for Animal Health/Food and Agriculture Organization FMD Laboratories Network websites. A total of 62 documents (26 studies and 36 reports) were eligible for analysis. Results showed that Uganda experienced 17 to 37 FMD outbreaks annually. Most of the studies focused on cattle (n = 20), with few targeting African buffalo (n = 3) and small ruminants (n = 2). The reports revealed that serotype O was the most isolated, followed by A, SAT 1, SAT 2, and SAT 3. FMD clustering was observed near international borders with Kenya and Tanzania and around Queen Elizabeth National Park. Identified risk factors included dry season, animal movements, proximity to borders, and pastoralism. The key control challenges included limited diagnostic capacity, FMD virus diversity, vaccine mismatch, and low vaccination coverage. The findings highlight the need for enhanced FMD monitoring, surveillance, and control strategies that consider circulating serotypes and topotypes, and improvement in vaccination coverage and strengthening of diagnostic capacity. Further research is needed to address the epidemiology of FMD in understudied species, including small ruminants, swine, and wildlife.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseAnimalsAnimals, WildCattleCattle DiseasesFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusLivestockUgandaCattleChallengesEpidemiologyFoot-and-mouth diseaseUgandaVirus

Identifiers

PMID40522510
PMCPMC12170765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.