ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
Effect of routine extradural optic canal decompression performed by skull base trained surgeons on visual outcomes in patients with anterior skull base meningiomas.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anterior Midline Skull Base Meningiomas: A Systematic Review of Resection Rates, Functional Outcomes, and Perioperative Complications Following Contemporary Endoscopic Endonasal Versus Transcranial Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Preliminary Experience with Extradural Clinoidectomy and Lamina Terminalis Fenestration in Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm Surgery: A Matched Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOptic canal decompression is a surgical option in anterior skull base tumors with optic nerve involvement. Meningiomas may grow into the optic canal even without evidence of involvement on MRI studies. We aim to investigate the effect of routine optic canal unroofing performed by skull base trained surgeons versus general neurosurgeons on the postoperative visual outcomes in anterior skull base meningiomas.
methodsBetween January 2013 and October 2023, consecutive patients in our institution who underwent craniotomies due to visual impairment were retrospectively reviewed. Patient records were screened for data on optic nerve compression, patient characteristics, lesion characteristics, intraoperative factors, the exact preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, as well as the postoperative clinical course. The primary outcome was the change in visual acuity postoperatively compared to the preoperative visual acuity. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed with best postoperative visual acuity as a dependent adjusting for prognostic factors.
resultsOut of 709 patients who underwent craniotomies for anterior skull base meningiomas, 94 patients showed optic nerve involvement on MRI. In total, 59 cases were treated by skull base trained surgeons and 35 by general neurosurgeons. Optic canal decompression was performed in 65% of the patients. There was no significant difference between patients treated by skull base surgeons and general neurosurgeons in terms of postoperative permanent complications. In patients with tuberculum sellae or anterior clinoid process meningiomas, postoperative secondary deterioration of visual acuity occurred in 40% (n = 10) of the cases treated by general neurosurgeons versus 11% (n = 4) in the group treated by skull base trained surgeons. In cases with a preoperative visual acuity of 0.2 or lower (35%, n = 33), 42% (n = 14) reached a best postoperative visual acuity of 0.5 or higher. Nineteen (20%) cases presented with functional blindness preoperatively. Of these, nine (47%) cases showed significant vision improvement postoperatively. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that patients with higher preoperative visual acuity reached a higher best visual acuity postoperatively.
conclusionPatients with tuberculum sellae and anterior clinoid process meningiomas benefit from skull base surgeons trained in extradural optic canal decompression, as reflected by lower postoperative secondary visual acuity deterioration in patients treated by skull base trained surgeons. All cases presenting with tumors with optic apparatus involvement should be managed by skull base trained surgeons to maximize postoperative visual acuity preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.