Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522464›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Oncological operation reports: minimum requirements, legal aspects and future developments].

Johannes Klose, Sandra Böhm, Christiane J Bruns, Paul Chojecki, Lena-Christin Conradi, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Robert Grützmann, Jörg Heberer, Boris Jansen-Winkeln, Jens Jakob and 9 more

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Johannes KloseKlinik für Viszerale, Gefäß- und Endokrine Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland. Johannes.Klose@uk-halle.de.
Sandra BöhmHFC Human Factors-Consult, Berlin, Deutschland.
Christiane J BrunsKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universität Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
Paul ChojeckiFraunhofer Heinrich-Hertz-Institut, Berlin, Deutschland.
Lena-Christin ConradiKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Stefan Fichtner-FeiglKlinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Robert GrützmannChirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Jörg HebererRechtsanwaltskanzlei Heberer & Kollegen, München, Deutschland.
Boris Jansen-WinkelnKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum St. Georg, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Jens JakobChirurgische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Kay KohlhawKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, MIC- und Gefäßchirurgie, Sana Klinikum Borna, Borna, Deutschland.
Astrid OehmeHFC Human Factors-Consult, Berlin, Deutschland.
Ulrich RonellenfitschKlinik für Viszerale, Gefäß- und Endokrine Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Susanne RothUniversitätsklinik für Allgemeine‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Christoph RügerChirurgische Klinik, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Igor SauerChirurgische Klinik, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Harald SchulzChirurgische Klinik, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Sven ZehnderChirurgische Klinik, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Jörg KleeffKlinik für Viszerale, Gefäß- und Endokrine Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The establishment of comprehensive oncological centers for the interdisciplinary care of cancer patients is based on defined criteria that must undergo regular external review to ensure a uniform quality standard of cancer care in Germany. The quality of surgical performance is defined, among other factors, by the number of cases treated or the experience of individual surgeons; however, the operation reports made are highly heterogeneous, as no specific requirements need to be met for certification as an oncological center. The German Association for Surgical Oncology (ACO) has therefore set the goal of proposing a minimum standard for oncological operation reports. In addition to the aspects to be included in the operation reports, exemplified with respect to individual organ systems, legal considerations and the use of artificial intelligence should also be examined in greater detail.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSurgical OncologyGermanyHumansArtificial intelligenceLawOncologyOperation reportQuality standard

Identifiers

PMID40522464
PMCPMC12457484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.