ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Pain during midlife: a cross-national analysis of cohort differences in reports of pain in the United States, Europe, South Korea, and Mexico.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering mechanisms of historical change in midlife loneliness across the United States and Europe: a focus on physical activity, health conditions, and wealth.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026Article
- Midlife blues: A lifespan perspective on midlife depressive symptoms.Psychology and aging · 2025Article
- Trajectories of episodic memory in midlife: Historical change from a cross-country perspective.Psychology and aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Middle-aged Americans today are reporting poorer mental, cognitive, and physical health compared to previous cohorts, but this trend has not been consistently observed in other nations. It is an open question whether pain shows similar cohort differences among US middle-aged adults compared to other nations. We used harmonized data on pain from nationally representative longitudinal panel surveys from the United States, 13 European nations (England, Continental, Mediterranean, and Nordic regions), South Korea, and Mexico to directly quantify cohort similarities and differences in midlife pain. Results from multilevel models demonstrated that midlife pain is higher among later-born cohorts in the United States than among earlier-born cohorts. The increased odds for later-born cohorts emerged in the early years of midlife, when people are in their early 50s. A similar pattern of increased odds of reporting pain for later-born cohorts was observed in England and Mexico. In contrast, decreased odds of reporting pain for later-born cohorts were observed in Continental, Mediterranean, and Nordic Europe as well as South Korea. Results for pain severity revealed a highly similar pattern. Our discussion focuses on potential explanations, including population-level discrepancies in use and quality of healthcare services and how pain is conceptualized across nations. This article is part of a Special Collection on Cross-National Gerontology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.