Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522452›Full record

Observational studyGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Intraocular inflammation following intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs.

Ana Margarida Ferreira, António Ferrão Mendes, João Nuno Beato, Ana Catarina Pedrosa, Susana Penas, Sónia Torres-Costa, Cláudia Oliveira Ferreira, Carolina Maia, Manuel Falcão, Ângela Carneiro

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Systemic and ocular complications related to intravitreal administration of anti-VEGF agents.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Margarida FerreiraOphthalmology Department, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal. amargaridapferreira@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3592-2820
António Ferrão MendesOphthalmology Department, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal.
João Nuno BeatoOphthalmology Department, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Catarina PedrosaOphthalmology Department, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal.
Susana PenasOphthalmology Department, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal.
Sónia Torres-CostaOphthalmology Department, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal.
Cláudia Oliveira FerreiraOphthalmology Department, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal.
Carolina MaiaOphthalmology Department, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal.
Manuel FalcãoOphthalmology Department, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal.
Ângela CarneiroOphthalmology Department, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe cases of infectious and non-infectious intraocular inflammation (NI-IOI) associated with intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs in the largest tertiary center with the highest number of IVI in Portugal.

methodsProspective observational study including all patients diagnosed with infectious endophthalmitis (IE) or NI-IOI after IVI of different anti-VEGF drugs in a total of 83,145 IVI between 2018 and 2023. The most frequent indications for treatment were macular neovascularization or macular edema from different etiologies.

resultsTwenty-six eyes developed IE (mean incidence 0.031%) after IVI and 24 eyes were diagnosed with NI-IOI (mean incidence 0.028%), including anterior plus intermediate uveitis (n = 18), only vitritis (n = 4) and retinal vasculitis (n = 2). Regarding NI-IOI, eyes were under treatment with aflibercept (n = 12), bevacizumab (n = 11) and faricimab (n = 1). The most common initial presentation was a painless decrease in visual acuity (VA) at a mean of 8 days [1-20] after IVI in patients with NI-IOI versus red eye, pain and blurry vision, at a mean of 3 days [1-9] after IVI in the IE group. There was a significant improvement in VA between the NI-IOI diagnosis and final visits (35 ± 25 vs. 49 ± 24 ETDRS letters) in the NI-IOI group (p = 0.022), an improvement that occurred over a mean of almost 2 months. There were no significant differences between VA at the time of diagnosis and after treatment (25 ± 28 vs. 26 ± 25 ETDRS letters) in the IE group (p = 0.801).

conclusionNI-IOI represents an emergent treatment-related adverse event, that can be reversible when adequately managed, contrasting with the sight-threatening severe cases of IE. We emphasize the importance of maintaining active surveillance in patients under intravitreal therapy.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsEndophthalmitisVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overBevacizumabFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceIntravitreal InjectionsMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRanibizumabafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AInfectious endophthalmitisIntraocular inflammationIntravitreal therapy

Identifiers

PMID40522452
PMCPMC12583367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.