Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522444›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Spinal anaesthetic with intrathecal diamorphine in robotic-assisted colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Hannah Foster-Rain, Marcel Gatt, Simon Davies, Andrew Scott, Murray Williams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah Foster-RainDepartment of Anaesthesia, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK. Hannah.Foster-Rain@nhs.net.
Marcel GattDepartment of Surgery, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Simon DaviesDepartment of Anaesthesia, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Andrew ScottDepartment of Anaesthesia, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Murray WilliamsDepartment of Anaesthesia, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal anaesthesia (SA) with intrathecal diamorphine can be utilised as part of multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid use and enhance recovery in patients undergoing major abdominal operations. There is limited evidence that this also applies to patients undergoing robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RACS). The aim of this study was to investigate perioperative opioid administration and post-operative complications in RACS patients receiving SA versus those who received conventional analgesia (CA). Data from 201 consecutive patients undergoing RACS at York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust were retrospectively included. 120 patients received SA with intrathecal diamorphine, and 81 patients received CA with oral and intravenous analgesia alone. The primary outcome was intra-operative and 24 h post-operative intravenous morphine equivalent (MEQ) administration. Secondary outcomes included post-operative nausea and vomiting, ileus, anastomotic leak, urinary retention, evidence of organ dysfunction, unplanned critical care admission, length of hospital stay, and death. There was a significant difference in both intra-operative and post-operative opioid MEQ administration in the SA group when compared to the CA group, respectively median (IQR) of 0 mg (0-6 mg) vs. 10 mg (5-15 mg), p < 0.001 and 5 mg (0-14.4 mg) vs. 20 mg (4.3-31.8 mg), p < 0.001. There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes assessed. This study suggests that SA may be an effective form of analgesia to reduce perioperative opioid administration in RACS. This did not translate into observed improvements in secondary outcomes. These observations would need to be validated in appropriately designed prospective studies.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalColorectal SurgeryHeroinRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansInjections, SpinalLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidHeroinIntrathecal anaesthesiaRobotic-assisted colorectal surgerySpinal anaesthesia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.