ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Personalised prostate MRI: tailoring contrast medium use in an era of increasing demand.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of bpMRI versus mpMRI and AI-assisted bpMRI in prostate cancer detection: a multi-reader study.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- The AI Act and the MDR post-market requirements for semiautonomous AI SaMD: a radiology case study in prostate cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Integrating MRI-based tumour staging within the TNM classification system in modern prostate cancer management.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Prostate MRI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction in Response to Cancer Screening Demands-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate MRI has an established role in early diagnosis, staging, and active surveillance of prostate cancer (PCa), and its demand continues to rise. Moreover, the growing use of active surveillance for patients with low-risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, along with ongoing research into MRI-based screening, is expected to further increase the need for MRI follow-up. Routine use of bi-parametric MRI and more selective, evidence-based administration of gadolinium contrast agents may help reduce the growing strain on MRI services. This special report explores scenarios in which contrast enhancement can improve diagnostic confidence, as well as situations where it may be safely omitted. It also examines the potential of on-table monitoring to guide patient-specific contrast administration, highlighting recent evidence suggesting this approach could reduce contrast use in three out of four men without compromising cancer detection or biopsy rates. Finally, the report outlines future research directions aimed at optimising scan times and contrast use in prostate cancer MRI. KEY POINTS: Question With the growing demand for prostate MRI, how can we optimise scanner and specialist time, minimise gadolinium use, and still maintain high diagnostic accuracy? Findings Syer et al demonstrate the feasibility of using on-table monitoring to reduce the number of contrast-enhanced prostate MRI exams by 76%, without compromising cancer detection or biopsy rates. Clinical relevance While promising, the effectiveness of on-table monitoring for guiding contrast-enhanced acquisitions requires further validation. Tailoring imaging protocols to individual patient risk profiles will be essential for optimising resource use while maintaining diagnostic quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.