ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025
Evaluation of the feasibility of anomaly detection for dose management in PET examinations.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOwing to the revision of the Medical Care Act in 2020, managing and recording radiation doses in PET-CT examinations have become mandatory. In this study, we investigated unsupervised anomaly detection methods as a potential solution to minimize input errors in dose recordings.
methodsWe analyzed data extracted from our database, including patient body weight, positron emission tomography (PET) dose, and dose length product (DLP). Several anomaly detection models, such as one-class support vector machine (OCSVM), Hotelling's T2 method, multivariate statistical process control (MSPC), isolation forest, and local outlier factor (LOF), were applied and compared. The dataset included 3509 entries for model training and 499 entries for evaluation. Anomalies that could be potential input errors were evaluated using metrics, such as precision, recall, F1 score, receiver operating characteristics-area under the curve (ROC-AUC), and precision-recall-AUC (PR-AUC).
resultsWe demonstrated that Hotelling's T2 method and MSPC's T
conclusionThese findings suggest that unsupervised anomaly detection is a promising approach to improve the accuracy of dose management in PET-CT examinations, enhancing patient safety and compliance with regulatory standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.