ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025
Aftercare following fatal traumatic injuries, needs and questions: a level 1 trauma center study and scoping review.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeApproximately 2,000 people die each year in the hospital due to accidental or inflicted traumatic injuries in the Netherlands. This has major emotional and socioeconomic consequences. Bereavement support is offered to prevent complicated grief, however, recommendations on adequate aftercare by the hospital are lacking.
methodsPatients with fatal traumatic injuries admitted to the Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, or Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUMC, between January 1st 2021, and January 1st 2023, were assessed for eligibility (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16, in-hospital mortality). Their relatives were contacted, and a questionnaire was administered to evaluate their experiences with the aftercare provided by the hospital. In addition, a scoping review was performed to report on recommendations to improve aftercare.
resultsA total of 1,131 articles were identified for the scoping review, of which 10 were selected for analysis (four questionnaires and six interview-based studies). The implementation of grief services by skilled professionals is recommended. The most frequently reported time between death and contact was 4-6 weeks, with contact conducted via telephone. During the study period, 110 patients met the inclusion criteria for the questionnaire. The median age of the deceased was 70 years (SD 20); 58% were male, with a median Injury Severity Score of 26 (range 16-75). Bereavement support was offered to 50% of the relatives, requested by 34%, and absent or lacking for 24%.
conclusionAftercare following traum-related in-hospital deaths remains inconsistent. Both the questionnaire and scoping review recommend structured aftercare. Aftercare, by telephone or face-to-face, conducted by a trained professional four weeks after the death, is suggested to favorably influence the course of bereavement or lead to timely referral for grief counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.