ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Core Flipping in Lead Optimization: Rank Ordering Using λ-Dynamics.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Benchmarking Docking Protocols on Predicting Alternative Binding Modes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In structure-based drug discovery, reliable structural models of ligands bound to their target receptors are critical for establishing the structure-activity relationship of the congeneric series. In such a series, substitutions on a common scaffold core might lead to different binding modes, ranging from slight changes of orientations to flipping or inversion of the core structure. Moreover, molecular docking might lead to alternative orientations within the top-ranked poses without being able to discriminate which is most likely. To determine the relative binding affinities between two alternative ligand poses, we propose a methodology based on relative binding free energy calculations using the λ-dynamics method. We used a dual-topology approach with distance-restraining schemes. We introduced a novel strategy using a one-step perturbation to calculate the contributions of the applied restraints. While using FEP/MBAR instead for that purpose led to smaller uncertainties, it suffered from convergence issues. We tested the validity and predictive power of our approach using two pharmaceutically relevant targets and eight small-molecule inhibitors from the experimentally characterized congeneric series. For each target, our approach correctly ranks the known X-ray poses as more favorable than alternative flipped poses. The proposed methodology can be easily extended to rank more than two poses and should also be applicable to the evaluation of alternative rotamers of target amino acids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.