Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522308›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2025

Malformations of cortical development: Embryology and epilepsy.

M Christianne Hoeberigs, Simon Tousseyn, ACE Study Group

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M Christianne HoeberigsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-170X
Simon TousseynAcademic Center for Epileptology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4139-0909
ACE Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One in seven patients with focal epilepsy has a malformation of cortical development (MCD) as underlying cause. Understanding normal cortical development combined with knowledge of where, when, and what goes wrong in different types of MCD provides insight into the mechanisms of epileptogenesis. Three different steps can be distinguished in the development of the neocortex: proliferation, migration, and organization. These three steps occur at different locations, partly overlapping in time. In this review, we illustrate and correlate normal embryology to the most common MCDs in epilepsy, namely, focal cortical dysplasia, heterotopia, and polymicrogyria, with discriminating imaging findings and clinical implications. By integrating current literature on embryology and imaging findings, we aim to provide insight into classification of cortical malformations and the consequences for workup and treatment. Illustrations of normal cortical embryology and early fetal development are supplemented with magnetic resonance images from our tertiary epilepsy center showing the three most frequently encountered malformations: focal cortical dysplasia (approximately half of identified MCDs at our center, consistent with literature), heterotopia (one third), and polymicrogyria (approximately 10%).

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexEpilepsyMalformations of Cortical DevelopmentHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPolymicrogyriafocal cortical dysplasiaheterotopiamalformations of cortical developmentpolymicrogyria

Identifiers

PMID40522308
PMCPMC12605774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.