ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Emerging Adults' Consideration of their Future General and Colorectal-Specific Cancer Risk.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of cancer awareness levels among health sciences students.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Understanding the Impact of Psychosocial Barriers on Colorectal Cancer Knowledge in Emerging Adult Black Men.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- "If I Start [Primary Prevention] Now, I Can Prevent [Cancer]": College Students Endorse Cancer Prevention Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionColorectal cancer (CRC) has a lengthy cellular mutation period and early onset (EOCRC) is linked to lifestyle-related factors. Primary prevention approaches earlier in the life course are needed. Emerging adulthood (age 18-25) is a critical stage for shaping health trajectories, and future orientation influences health behavior decisions. Little is known about emerging adults' consideration of future cancer risk (CFC-Cancer), or perceived CRC risk. This study characterizes emerging adult CFC-Cancer, perceived CRC risk, and how they relate to EOCRC lifestyle related factors and cancer prevention behaviors.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of college students at a public university. Measures included demographics, stress, family cancer history, and CRC knowledge. Previously validated measures for diet, sedentariness, smoking, alcohol consumption, and stress management assessed adherence with lifestyle prevention guidelines. HPV vaccination and skin checks appraised cancer prevention. Outcomes included perceived CRC risk (0%-100%) and CFC-Cancer adapted scale. Adjusted linear regression models examined CFC-Cancer and perceived CRC risk predictability.ResultsThe sample (N = 282) mean age was 20 years, 77% were female, 40% were White, and 67% had family cancer history. CRC knowledge μ = 14, and current stress was moderate. 18% completed both cancer prevention behaviors, and protective lifestyle behavior scores ranged between 2-15, μ = 8. Perceived CRC risk = 28%, and CFC-Cancer was moderate (μ = 61). CFC-Cancer model included significant predictors of GPA, CRC knowledge, and lifestyle health behavior score, while Perceived CRC Risk model included age and being employed.ConclusionEmerging adults overestimate CRC risk but also have moderate CFC-Cancer. Accurate CRC knowledge provided to this age group may help redirect CRC health trajectories through integration of EOCRC protective lifestyle health behaviors and sustaining them into adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.