Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521976›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

Comparing Myopia Control Effects of Three Different Orthokeratology Lenses and Spectacle Lenses With Highly Aspherical Lenslets in Low Myopia Children.

Na Li, Luodian Luobu, Bei Du, Weiping Lin, Ruihua Wei

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Na LiTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Luodian LuobuTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Bei DuTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Weiping LinTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ruihua WeiTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of three different orthokeratology (OK) lenses and highly aspherical-lenslet spectacle lenses (HAL) for myopia control in young children with low myopia, and to compare the relative corneal refractive power (RCRP) distributions among the three OK lenses with different designs. Methods: This retrospective study involved 166 children aged eight to 11 years with myopia of -0.50 to -3.00 D treated with ProTong OK lenses with aspheric base curve (APOK), ProTong OK lenses with spherical base curve (SPOK), Euclid OK lenses (EOK), HAL, or single-vision spectacle lenses (SVL). Axial length (AL) was measured at baseline and the 12-month visit. Corneal topography was measured for OK wearers to determine the distance from the apex RCRP profile to its three-quarter-peak. Results: The axial elongation for the APOK, SPOK, HAL, EOK, and SVL groups were 0.17 ± 0.14 mm, 0.25 ± 0.17 mm, 0.11 ± 0.15 mm, 0.37 ± 0.12 mm, and 0.45 ± 0.16 mm after 12 months, respectively. Axial elongation was significantly slower for the APOK, SPOK, and HAL groups than for the EOK or SVL groups (all P < 0.05); and it was significantly slower in HAL than in SPOK wearers (P < 0.05). 59.5% and 42.9% of HAL and APOK wearers experienced axial elongation of ≤0.15 mm, respectively. The HAL and APOK, SPOK and APOK, or EOK and SVL groups showed no significant differences in axial elongation. Both SPOK and APOK groups had lower 3/4X values than the EOK group. Conclusions: HAL and APOK wear, relative to EOK or SVL wear, by eight- to 11-year-old children with low myopia led to comparable yet slower axial elongation. APOK and SPOK led to a steeper distribution of the RCRP profile within the pupillary range and yielded better myopia control than EOK. Translational Relevance: HAL and APOK are recommended for effective myopia control in children aged eight to 11 years with mild myopia.

Indexed as

Contact LensesEyeglassesMyopiaOrthokeratologic ProceduresAxial Length, EyeChildCorneal TopographyFemaleHumansMaleRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID40521976
PMCPMC12186544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.