ArticleThoracic cancer2025
Prognostic Impact of Tumor Solid Components in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Clinical Stage Tis-1N0M0 Lung Cancer.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Consolidation-to-Tumor Ratio on Prognosis After Radiation therapy for Lung Cancer With a Lesion Diameter of 3 cm or Less.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to assess the potential of prognostic factors including consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) on treatment outcomes in patients with clinical stage 0-IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
methodsThe analysis included data of 63 patients with 67 lesions of clinical stage 0-IA NSCLC treated with SBRT. According to the Union for International Cancer Control 8th edition, the following tumor stages were observed: Tis, 3; T1mi, 2; T1a, 11; T1b, 29; and T1c, 22. The prescribed dose was 48 (range, 42-52) Gy in four fractions.
resultsThe median follow-up was 29.3 (range: 2.4-120.5) months. The five-year local control (LC), overall survival, and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 89.4%, 60.3%, and 40.5%, respectively. Squamous cell carcinoma (Sq) and D
conclusionIn patients with stage 0-IA lung cancer treated with SBRT, tumors classified as ≤ T1a showed a better PFS than T1b-c. NSCLC with a low CTR of ≤ 0.25 seemed to have a low risk of recurrence after SBRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.