Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521714›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025

Responses of house crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) to various dietary gross energy levels: effects on growth performance and nutrient deposition.

Sutisa Khempaka, Supattra Okrathok, Jan Th Schonewille, Chayanan Pukkung, Merisa Sirisopapong, Orapin Jantasaeng, Phocharapon Pasri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effect and Optimal Level of Dietary Dried Watermeal (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sutisa KhempakaSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Supattra OkrathokAnimal Production Innovation and Management Division, Faculty of Natural Resources, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai Campus, Songkhla, Thailand.
Jan Th SchonewilleDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 7, Utrecht, 3584 CM, Netherlands.
Chayanan PukkungSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Merisa SirisopapongSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Orapin JantasaengSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Phocharapon PasriSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crickets present a sustainable protein alternative with a lower ecological footprint compared to traditional animal proteins. This research aimed to investigate the effect of dietary energy density on feed intake, growth, and body composition in house crickets (Acheta domesticus L., Orthoptera: Gryllidae) up to 45 d after hatching. The study consisted of 2 phases (7 to 20 and 21 to 45 d of age), with house crickets randomly assigned to 5 dietary treatments, each with six replicates. Dietary energy levels ranged from 3,819 to 4,265 kcal gross energy (GE)/kg in phase 1 and from 3,978 to 4,405 kcal GE/kg in phase 2. As dietary energy density increased, feed intake linearly decreased, while body mass linearly increased. In phase 1, protein retention increased from 72.1% to 85.5% as GE increased from 3,819 to 4,265 kcal /kg. Similarly, in phase 2, protein retention increased from 53.3% to 59.3% as GE increased from 3,978 to 4,379 kcal/kg. Correspondingly, the feed conversion ratio (FCR) improved with increasing dietary GE values. Broken-line analysis revealed the lowest FCR at 4,158 and 4,382 kcal GE/kg feed for house crickets from 7 to 20 and 21 to 45 d after hatching, respectively. These findings confirm the relevance of energy density in achieving optimal growth performance and provide valuable insights for formulating nutritious cricket diets. However, caution is warranted when extrapolating these results, as diets were formulated using GE instead of metabolizable energy (ME). Future studies should determine cricket-specific ME values to fine-tune dietary energy density.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeGryllidaeAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBody CompositionDietEnergy MetabolismFemaleMalebody compositionefficiencyfeed conversion ratiogross energy requirement

Identifiers

PMID40521714
PMCPMC12168125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.