ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
Treatment of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy with Hysteroscopic Resection.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reproductive Outcomes Following High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is an ectopic that is located in the myometrium of a previous C-section of the scar. It is rare but threatening. The aim of this study was to introduce 10 cases of CSP treated with hysteroscopic resection. In the preoperative phase, the patients with beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) titers more than 10,000 were treated with methotrexate (MTX) to reduce B-hCG titers. Two patients did not receive MTX. All patients were treated with hysteroscopic resection except one patient, who underwent hysteroscopic resectoscopy due to a lack of reduction of B-hCG and due to unrepairable scar site of cesarean and uterine perforation eventuate hysterectomy. All patients had normal menstrual cycles as well as the negative β-hCG level after 2 months. Moreover, no recurrence was reported after 3 years. Low-invasive treatments such as hysteroscopic resection can be an important step to maintain fertility and the general health of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.